Workplace surveillance is becoming more common as employers seek to monitor productivity and safeguard their operations. According to a recent survey by Gartner, 60% of large organizations use tracking tools to monitor employee activity, a number expected to rise to 70% in the next few years. The shift to remote work has accelerated this trend, with nearly 50% of companies adopting digital monitoring tools for remote employees, according to a 2023 survey by Digital.com.
While these tools can boost efficiency, they raise important concerns about employee privacy and the boundaries of surveillance. In this post, we’ll break down the legal aspects of workplace surveillance, the different methods used, and how companies can create clear policies that balance business needs with employee rights.
.jpeg)
Monitoring employees is governed by both federal and state laws designed to protect privacy while allowing businesses to monitor work-related activities.
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) sets the federal standard, permitting employers to monitor business communications. However, some states, like California, impose stricter rules requiring employee consent for certain types of surveillance.
Employees can bring common-law claims for invasion of privacy if monitoring is deemed too invasive. Courts weigh whether the employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the situation. For example, personal calls made on a work phone may be considered private once identified as non-work-related.
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects employees engaging in union-related activities or discussing workplace conditions. Monitoring such communications can violate labor laws if it interferes with protected concerted activity.
Employers use various types of monitoring tools to track activities in the workplace, each of which requires careful consideration of its impact on employee privacy.
Companies that provide call-monitoring services, such as Nice, help businesses track telephone conversations to ensure service quality and regulatory compliance. Employers can monitor business-related calls but must stop listening once a personal call is identified. Using a service like Nice ensures that monitoring is focused on professional interactions without overstepping privacy boundaries.
Email and text communication monitoring software, like Proofpoint, enables companies to scan for data breaches and policy violations. Proofpoint helps businesses monitor communications for security reasons, ensuring employees don’t share confidential information. However, employers need to inform their employees that emails and texts sent through company systems can be monitored.
Many companies use tools like Teramind to track employee internet use, ensuring that company resources are used for work-related purposes. Teramind tracks activities like website visits, file downloads, and app usage, helping companies protect their networks from unauthorized access or malicious downloads. This type of monitoring focuses on security rather than employee personal behavior.
Surveillance systems from companies like Coram are often used to monitor public areas in office spaces. For example, companies use video monitoring to secure entrances and sensitive workspaces. The system ensures that only authorized personnel enter restricted areas. However, video surveillance must be limited to non-private areas, as laws prohibit the use of cameras in places like restrooms and break rooms.
Remote monitoring software such as Hubstaff allows businesses to track productivity by logging hours, tracking keystrokes, and taking screenshots of employee work. Companies adopt these tools to ensure that remote workers stay productive during work hours. Hubstaff offers transparency by allowing employees to review their logged time and activities.
Some companies use services like Social Intelligence, which monitors employees’ off-duty social media activity to identify potential risks to the business’s reputation. This type of monitoring is usually limited to public posts and activity. While it can be useful for protecting a company’s image, it must be handled with care to avoid overstepping into employees’ private lives.
A clear and transparent monitoring policy helps avoid legal pitfalls and maintains employee trust. Here are steps for crafting a comprehensive surveillance policy:
Common types of workplace monitoring include phone call monitoring, email and text monitoring, internet use tracking, video surveillance, and monitoring remote workers' activity through software. These methods help companies protect data, ensure productivity, and maintain security.
Yes, workplace monitoring is generally legal, but it must comply with federal and state laws. Employers must ensure their surveillance practices align with the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) and any relevant state laws, which may require employee consent for specific types of monitoring.
Employers can monitor business-related calls and emails but should stop monitoring if a call or email is identified as personal. Consent may be required to monitor personal communications, depending on the laws in your state.
Workplace surveillance is essential for protecting company resources and maintaining productivity, but it must be done legally and ethically. By using the right tools, such as those from providers like Nice, Proofpoint, Teramind, Verkada, Hubstaff, and Social Intelligence, and establishing clear policies, companies can find the right balance between business interests and employee privacy.
Jack is the Co-Founder and CEO at Litespace on a mission to help workers collaborate more. He is very excited to build the future of work and make work more productive and engaging.
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
%20(1).png)
.png){kind=logo}